US v. Apple: everything you need to know

The US Division of Justice has filed a case against Apple for violating antitrust rules. Extra specifically, the case revolves round how Apple has dilapidated its locked-down iPhone ecosystem to manufacture a monopoly.

The DOJ alleges that Apple blocks “gigantic” apps, suppresses cell cloud streaming services, blocks terrible-platform messaging apps, limits third-occasion digital wallets, and even limits how smartly third-occasion smartwatches work on its platforms. That is the third time that the DOJ has sued Apple for antitrust violations in the past 14 years, and if you’re questioning why it modified into as soon as filed in Contemporary Jersey, we can also need an motive in the abet of that.

All the diagram thru a press conference asserting the lawsuit, Deputy AG Lisa Monaco acknowledged Apple’s efforts “smothered a entire alternate.” A response to the lawsuit from Apple spokesperson Fred Sainz says, “This lawsuit threatens who we are and the foundations that residing Apple products aside in fiercely aggressive markets.”

The DOJ’s complaint “…made a wonderful stronger case than I realizing that they’ll also,” acknowledged Vanderbilt Law College professor Rebecca Haw Allensworth. She continued on, asserting, “They told a extraordinarily coherent story about how Apple is making its product, the iPhone and the products on it – the apps — less precious for customers in the name of preserving their dominance.”

This case is possible to comprise a smartly-liked impact, and given how prolonged the DOJ’s case against Microsoft in the ’90s lasted, it goes to be a whereas sooner than we behold a resolution.

Your entire news and updates in regards to the DOJ v. Apple case continue below.

  • United States v. Apple is pure nerd rage

    Illustration by Cath Virginia / The Verge

    United States v. Apple is a lawsuit written for the usual public, an 88-page press launch designed to be read aloud on cable news reveals. 

    A lawsuit is, functionally speaking, a verbal replace between attorneys and a attain to a call. Due to it is miles a in actuality ultimate missive to a in actuality ultimate target audience, it goes to grow to be extremely technical and jargonistic — here is in particular so when it comes to arena of interest areas of law fancy antitrust or complex sectors of litigation fancy technology. Tech lawsuits are in overall vague even to techies, interspersed with odd tool terminology that in all equity much meaningless out of doorways of a court of law. (For instance, antitrust law loves “middleware,” and copyright law loves “technological security measure.”)

    Read Article>

  • How a artificial tooth monopoly set the DOJ’s blockbuster Apple antitrust swimsuit in Contemporary Jersey

    Image: The Verge / Getty Photographs

    So, what attain artificial teeth comprise to attain with the Division of Justice’s massive lawsuit against Apple? Neatly, they’ll also be one among the causes why the DOJ determined to file its lawsuit in the yelp of Contemporary Jersey — in its set of, negate, Virginia or Washington, DC, fancy it did for Google and Microsoft.

    The DOJ beforehand filed — and gained — a the same antitrust case against an organization that makes untrue teeth in the Third Circuit, which involves Contemporary Jersey.

    Read Article>

  • ‘Even stronger’ than imagined: DOJ’s sweeping Apple lawsuit draws knowledgeable praise

    Cath Virginia / The Verge

    The Division of Justice’s antitrust division has attain into its agree with, having filed its third tech monopoly lawsuit in four years.

    The gathered ride reveals up in the complaint, in accordance to antitrust experts who spoke with The Verge in regards to the complaint filed Thursday accusing Apple of violating antitrust law. The DOJ describes a sweeping arc of behaviors by Apple, arguing that it adds up to a pattern of illegal monopoly repairs. In set of specializing in two or three illegal acts, the complaint alleges that Apple engages in a pattern of behaviors that additional entrench customers into their ecosystem and discover it tougher to swap, even in the face of excessive costs and degraded quality. 

    Read Article>

  • Meet Jonathan Kanter, the man heading the antitrust price against Apple.

    This Contemporary York Cases article affords a top level procedure of Kanter’s occupation in criticizing competitors, from representing Microsoft’s offensive against Google one day of the Obama administration to main the DOJ’s Antitrust Division.

    “In many ways, he’s easy shopping for that extra notorious trophy to gallop on the mantelpiece,” acknowledged broken-down FTC chair William Kovacic. “You internet one among these monopolization cases, you can steal the rest of the last decade off.”

  • Apple’s antitrust combat begins

    Image: Alex Parkin / The Verge

    Over the direction of 88 pages of surprisingly readable legalese, the US Division of Justice tried to discover the case that Apple is an argument. Apple, the DOJ alleges in its sweeping antitrust complaint, has systematically crushed innovation in the smartphone world, robbing no longer simplest competitors nonetheless also iPhone users of the different to recover tool and spend greater hardware.

    The argument is complicated, nonetheless it completely has an terrible lot in usual with one more mountainous antitrust trial, one the authorities gained greater than two an extended time ago: US v. Microsoft. That case modified into as soon as about an colossal company ruthlessly working to neutralize any company that threatened to launch up its walled gardens, discover it easy for folk to manufacture and spend terrible-platform tool, or discontinue the retain watch over it had over its vastly winning and vastly smartly-liked platform. This one is terribly various nonetheless also very much the identical.

    Read Article>

  • Smartwatches shouldn’t discover you settle both Apple or Android

    The Apple Detect-iPhone connection is smartly established.

    Photo by Amelia Holowaty Krales / The Verge

    When other folks quiz me what smartwatch they’ll also easy buy, I repeatedly quiz them the identical quiz: what cell phone attain you comprise?

    Sadly, the cell phone you comprise largely dictates which smartwatches you have to buy. They aren’t standalone devices. You need a cell phone to residing them up, and since the US Division of Justice identified in its monopoly case against Apple, that makes them the supreme accessory for locking other folks into an ecosystem. If you exhaust $400 on an Apple Detect and completely esteem it, you’re less possible to stop on an iPhone you don’t fancy.

    Read Article>

  • Spotify and Deezer applaud the Apple antitrust swimsuit

    Illustration by Kristen Radtke / The Verge

    Spotify, Deezer, and various Apple critics are having a discipline day today. This morning, the Division of Justice filed an antitrust swimsuit over how Apple controls the smartphone market. This comes in addition to to Apple’s woes in Europe, where it is miles mitigating compliance with the Digital Markets Act and has been ordered to pay a $2 billion beautiful following a complaint made by Spotify.

    The DOJ complaint, which modified into as soon as joined by attorneys usual and district attorneys from 16 various states, alleges that “Apple undermines apps, products, and services that may per chance otherwise discover users less reliant on the iPhone, promote interoperability, and lower charges for customers and builders.”

    Read Article>

  • Why is the Division of Justice suing Apple?

    For a hasty and obvious explanation, deputy editor Alex Cranz spells out the antitrust lawsuit filed today in only below 5 minutes.

  • The lock-in disaster at the heart of the Apple monopoly lawsuit

    Inexperienced bubbles are in actuality a mountainous section of the DOJ’s case against Apple.

    Illustration by Cath Virginia / The Verge

    It’s no secret that Apple products work most effective if you stick to an iPhone. It turns out that’s a mountainous the explanation why Apple landed in scorching water today with the US Division of Justice, which alleges that the company went too a ways in locking down messaging, smartwatches, and digital wallets to intentionally scurry its competitors.

    This gained’t be a surprise to most customers. We’ve all known for years about inexperienced bubbles and that you can’t bring your Apple Detect to an Android cell phone. What the DOJ is asserting is that, altogether, this sequence of protective policies makes it extraordinarily complicated for an iPhone person to gallop away its walled backyard, limiting competitors so much that it breaks the law.

    Read Article>

  • How Apple’s war on gigantic apps modified into the heart of its antitrust combat

    Cath Virginia / The Verge

    Apple is facing a broad antitrust lawsuit from the Division of Justice, and a huge section of the company’s argument centers round Apple’s alleged makes an are trying to suppress cloud gaming services and so-called “gigantic” apps. Particularly, the DOJ claims Apple stifled the event of both forms of services to protect its monopoly on the cell market.

    As cloud streaming services began becoming extra smartly-liked in 2020, Apple introduced novel suggestions that appeared designed to give services fancy Xbox Cloud Gaming, Fb Gaming, and GeForce Now a collection on the App Store. But in actuality, it did the different. The suggestions severely restricted the presence of cloud gaming services on the App Store, as Apple required builders to put up their games to the App Store for approval in my procedure — as a replacement of having them exist in a singular hub of games.

    Read Article>

  • 5 takeaways from the mighty US antitrust lawsuit against Apple

    Apple CEO Tim Cook dinner.

    Cath Virginia / The Verge | Photo by Bloomberg, Getty Photographs

    The US Division of Justice is suing Apple for “monopolizing smartphone markets” to abet guarantee the iPhone’s continued success — to the detriment of customers and third-occasion builders. The swimsuit modified into as soon as filed on March 21st and can easy steal a prolonged time to play out. It touches on everything from iMessage lock-in and App Store developer charges to “gigantic apps” and cloud gaming. If the authorities is winning, lets examine a sea alternate 2d for the iPhone and Apple’s ecosystem at gigantic.

    Apple, as expected, is deeply valuable of the DOJ’s antitrust submitting. “This lawsuit threatens who we are and the foundations that residing Apple products aside in fiercely aggressive markets,” acknowledged Apple spokesperson Fred Sainz. The corporate also acknowledged the correct combat sets “a terrible precedent, empowering authorities to steal a heavy hand in designing other folks’s technology.”

    Read Article>


    Cath Virginia / The Verge | Photo by Getty Photographs

    The US Division of Justice accused Apple of running an illegal monopoly in the smartphone market in an immense novel antitrust lawsuit that seeks to upend loads of the ways Apple locks down iPhones.

    The DOJ, together with 16 yelp and district attorneys usual, accuses Apple of driving up costs for customers and builders at the expense of making users extra reliant on its telephones. The parties snarl that Apple “selectively” imposes contractual restrictions on builders and withholds valuable ways of accessing the cell phone as a diagram to prevent competitors from constructing, in accordance to the launch.

    Read Article>

  • Apple’s response to the DOJ’s iPhone antitrust lawsuit.

    The assertion from Apple spokesperson Fred Sainz in response to the antitrust lawsuit introduced this morning:

    At Apple, we innovate on daily basis to discover technology other folks esteem—designing products that work seamlessly together, give protection to other folks’s privacy and security, and repair a magical ride for our users. This lawsuit threatens who we are and the foundations that residing Apple products aside in fiercely aggressive markets.

    If winning, it would perhaps per chance presumably hinder our skill to attach the form of technology other folks request from Apple—where hardware, tool, and services intersect. It would also residing a terrible precedent, empowering authorities to steal a heavy hand in designing other folks’s technology. We ponder this lawsuit is rotten on the facts and the law, and we can vigorously protect against it.

  • Press conference wraps with Kanter asserting Apple’s decisions comprise made its system less inner most.

    Kanter acknowledged the lawsuit explains “the illegal and exclusionary habits that Apple has engaged in is no longer mandatory to give protection to security and privacy.” To the different, “in many cases, Apple’s habits has made its ecosystem less inner most and less earn.”

  • Garland addresses massive helpful resource imbalance between DOJ and Apple.

    “When you comprise an establishment with so much of sources, that in our procedure is harming the American financial system and the American other folks, it’s vital for us to allocate our sources to give protection to the American other folks,” Garland acknowledged. “And that is indubitably the case where particular person American citizens don’t comprise any skill to give protection to themselves.”

  • Apple has felt threatened by easy ways to swap between iPhone and Android, says Kanter.

    “Apple has prolonged relied on contractual restrictions as a replacement of competitors on the merits to fortify its monopoly vitality,” Kanter acknowledged. He pointed to emails between an Apple govt and then-CEO Steve Jobs in 2010, lamenting a Kindle ad where an particular person switches seamlessly between the Kindle app on an iPhone and an Android.

  • Apple benefited from DOJ’s Microsoft case.

    Apple modified into as soon as a “valuable beneficiary” of the DOJ’s swimsuit against Microsoft greater than 20 years ago, acknowledged Jonathan Kanter, assistant attorney usual for the Antitrust Division. “The solve paved the diagram for Apple to launch iTunes, iPod and in the raze the iPhone.”

    He described the novel swimsuit as a diagram “to give protection to competitors and innovation for the subsequent generation of technology.”

  • You can also easy read this epic story from 2000 on the Microsoft antitrust trial.

    I reread this massive Wired section this morning on the practice, a propos of, you know, things. It’s an wonderful epic of antitrust battle, and it’s wild how much of what the DOJ acknowledged and did about Microsoft rhymes with today’s lawsuit against Apple.

    I’d wager that Tim Cook dinner asserting “buy your mom an iPhone” will grow to be an iconic accurate phrase the diagram “cut back off Netscape’s air supply” did 25 years ago.

  • The Apple swimsuit echos DOJ’s earlier Microsoft disaster, DOJ says.

    The novel complaint “alleges that Apple has engaged in loads of the identical tactics that Microsoft dilapidated,” Performing Affiliate Attorney Customary Benjamin Mizer acknowledged, referencing the DOJ’s landmark antitrust case at the turn of the century.

  • Apple has maintained “a chokehold on competitors,” deputy AG says.

    Apple has “smothered a entire alternate” by transferring from “revolutionizing the smartphone market to stalling its pattern,” in accordance to Lisa Monaco.

  • Apple doesn’t in actuality attain everything for security, AG alleges.

    Garland described how Apple “inserts itself into the direction of” of transactions thru its digital wallets, when customers can also “select to section that knowledge fully with their monetary institution.”

    “That is correct one diagram whereby Apple is willing to discover the iPhone less earn and less inner most, in describe to protect its monopoly vitality,” Garland acknowledged.

  • Read the lawsuit: United States v. Apple

    Cath Virginia / The Verge

    The US Division of Justice introduced today that it’s suing Apple for illegally monopolizing the smartphone market and utilizing its space “to extract extra cash from customers, builders, boom creators, artists, publishers, minute corporations, and merchants.”

    In the 88-page swimsuit, which modified into as soon as filed in the United States District Court docket for the District of Contemporary Jersey, the Justice Division alleges that Apple is utilizing a vary of unfair tactics to entrench its market space and restrict innovation. These consist of blockading so-called “Stunning Apps,” which would discover it more uncomplicated for customers to swap between smartphone platforms, imposing an efficient ban on cloud streaming services for boom fancy games, degrading the ride for terrible-platform messaging apps, restricting the compatibility of non-Apple smartwatches with its telephones, and barring third-occasion builders from accessing the iPhone’s faucet-to-pay purpose to supply their agree with digital wallets.

    Read Article>

  • Garland takes on inexperienced texts.

    The AG says it’s no longer correct that the inexperienced texts between Android and iPhone devices are disturbing, there’s also “restricted performance.”

    “Movies are pixelated and grainy, and users can’t edit messages or behold typing indicators,” Garland acknowledged.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

You May Also Like