California’s concerning embrace of a new forest biomass industry

California’s concerning embrace of a new forest biomass industry

Gloria Alonso Cruz had fully lawful started working on environmental justice complications at a community organization in Stockton, California, when she learned about a proposal to sell wooden pellets from the city’s port to overseas vitality markets. 

Golden State Natural Assets plans to gain two wooden pellet plants in Lassen and Tuolumne counties, about 250 miles north of Stockton, with the goal of exporting a million heaps a year. While forest-based biomass may sound innocuous, each part of the pellet manufacturing chain bears an environmental justice or air pollution chance, says Rita Vaughan Frost, forest advocate at Natural Assets Defense Council. 

First, trees are logged and stacked on vans to be driven to processing facilities. There, the wooden is grew to become into small pellets, similar to rabbit meals. Then, diesel vans transport the material hundreds of miles to a transport facility and export terminal, savor the Port of Stockton — where storage poses a fireplace chance. The pellets are later shipped to markets in Europe and Asia, where they’re burned to create electrical energy, generating carbon emissions. 

Golden State Natural Helpful resource’s proposal would allow it to harvest trees from forests inner 100 miles of the 2 processing plants. This radius involves sixteen national forests in a location recognized for its critical biodiversity. A 20-year master stewardship agreement established with the U.S. Forest Carrier will allow the company to harvest from public lands thru 2045, when the state is slated to achieve carbon neutrality. 

Many will doubtless be greatly surprised to learn that burning wooden pellets causes extra air pollution per unit of electrical energy than coal does, says Shaye Wolf, the climate science director at the Center for Biological Diversity. “It’s worsening the climate emergency at a time after we’ve obtained to be rapidly chopping those carbon emissions,” Wolf says. 

In Stockton, the threat of logging exports compounds environmental injustices that already exist. State laws don’t forestall companies from constructing polluting facilities in already overburdened areas, nor is there any statute or legal framework that forces corporations to have in ideas federal goals of transitioning toward renewable vitality sources.  

This means there are no federal or state guardrails to guard against the fact that “builders are no longer accounting for cumulative impacts, [or] the fact that these natural sources are finite,” Cruz says. In fact, Stockton already has a lot of air pollution: It ranks in the 90th percentile statewide, according to CalEnviroScreen, an environmental hazard mapping tool. Compared with diversified cities across California, Stockton’s has some of the absolute top overall exposure to toxins savor ozone, particulate matter, and groundwater threats. 

Cruz says that is intentional, noting the communities of coloration and farmworkers who are living and work in the state’s Central Valley have always shouldered the public health consequences that industries leave in their wake. In fact, California funneled public funds to the biomass industry in the Eighties and Nineties to make stronger the improvement of factories in low-income communities. Now, the wooden pellet biomass industry and Golden State Natural Assets are poised to make the situation worse.

In 2015, the state approved a new law that requires polluting corporations, savor the wooden pellet industry, to pay for environmental justice initiatives in disadvantaged cities savor Stockon, however advocates savor Cruz argue that corporations shouldn’t be allowed to pollute in the primary place. Across the state, at least four active biomass plants are in census tracts that face the worst air pollution burden. 

Looking out at how the biomass industry currently operates in the Southeastern United States heightens residents’ worries. Companies there have a track file of preying on overburdened, beneath-resourced communities, says Vaughan Frost.

In the South, pellet mills are 50 p.c extra doubtless to be placed in communities of coloration that fall below the state poverty line. Although the industry likes to talk about offering jobs, in one North Carolina community, the poverty rate actually increased after a wooden pellet manufacturing plant began operations. 

Wherever pellet mills take root, air pollution quickly follows. A considerable scent, akin to plastic burning in a campfire, often emanates from these processing facilities. Heather Hillaker, an attorney with the Southern Environmental Law Center, says that processing the wooden creates volatile organic compounds, which mix with diversified pollutants to create flooring level ozone and smog. Processing facilities also release toxins savor formaldehyde, methanol, and acrolein, substances that can cause cancer even in small doses. 

Hillaker warns that federal standards established by the Clean Air Act don’t take into consideration the extra than one varieties of air pollution that overburdened communities face, she says. 

“I’ve no longer really viewed the pellet industry at once address, in any variety of meaningful way, the environmental justice impacts of their operations in the South,” Hillaker says. She explains they often argue “We are complying with our permits and attributable to this fact we’re no longer causing any harm.” However she says, “That’s no longer an accurate representation of what’s actually happening in these local communities.” 

Vaughan Frost is anxious that Golden State Natural Assets will similarly undermine the health and wellbeing of California communities. 

Vaughan Frost believes the industry is “exploiting the state’s traumatic abilities of catastrophic wildfires to sell their plan.” The company claims that chopping down forests will present less gas for wildfires — a claim that the state of California has historically parroted. Many scientists disagree. One latest see came across that in fireplace-inclined western states, emissions related to broad-scale thinning biomass harvest were 5 times greater than those related to wildfire. California also has a historical past of lumping in wooden pellet biomass as a “renewable” vitality provide, which critics say obfuscates the compounding climate threats of the industry. She says these claims — that logging can forestall wildfires and create renewable vitality — are a distraction from legitimate wildfire prevention strategies, savor home hardening and vegetation management. 

Advocates fear that once the forest is long past, recovery will doubtless be sophisticated. The wooden pellet industry will quickly be making incursions all thru the Sierra Nevadas, a considerable-loved mountain range that regularly draws out of doors tourists. Though the industry pledges to replant what they log, as climate change intensifies, there’s no guarantee monoculture saplings will doubtless be able to offer the same ecosystem products and companies that the logged forest once did. 

With abundant wind and solar vitality available, Vaughan Frost says, “We accomplish no longer want to sacrifice California forests and communities for this.”


NRDC (Natural Assets Defense Council) is an international nonprofit environmental organization with extra than 3 million members and online activists. Established in 1970, NRDC makes exercise of science, coverage, law, and other folks energy to confront the climate crisis, shield public health, and safeguard nature. NRDC has offices in New York Metropolis, Washington, D.C., Los Angeles, San Francisco, Chicago, Bozeman, MT, Beijing, and Delhi (an office of NRDC India Pvt. Ltd). Learn extra at http://www.nrdc.org and practice on Twitter @NRDC.


Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

You May Also Like